<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maybe Google should follow its own advice&#8230;..</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gearyi.com/fresh/maybe-google-should-follow-its-own-advice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gearyi.com/fresh/maybe-google-should-follow-its-own-advice/</link>
	<description>Geary's Collaborative Thoughts about What's New and Fresh</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:43:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: holly</title>
		<link>http://gearyi.com/fresh/maybe-google-should-follow-its-own-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>holly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearyi.com/fresh/maybe-google-should-follow-its-own-advice/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Haha....5-11= -6

Seems like Cuil may have a ways to go before they can live up to their &quot;better than Google&quot; claims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha&#8230;.5-11= -6</p>
<p>Seems like Cuil may have a ways to go before they can live up to their &#8220;better than Google&#8221; claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phelan</title>
		<link>http://gearyi.com/fresh/maybe-google-should-follow-its-own-advice/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>Phelan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gearyi.com/fresh/maybe-google-should-follow-its-own-advice/#comment-149</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s classic. I had to try it myself just to see. +3 for Cuil for having a cool title for their own number one search result.

-1 for Google letting go of these employees to start up their own competing site.

+2 for Cuil creating buzz about them.

-10 for Cuil&#039;s search results and lack of properly functional site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s classic. I had to try it myself just to see. +3 for Cuil for having a cool title for their own number one search result.</p>
<p>-1 for Google letting go of these employees to start up their own competing site.</p>
<p>+2 for Cuil creating buzz about them.</p>
<p>-10 for Cuil&#8217;s search results and lack of properly functional site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

